Humanitarianism is definitely cliché, but one that is cliché is popular in the 21st century. No, this isn’t an attack, this is a real-life scenario put in words. But there isn’t any fault if cliché concepts benefit the world in either sense. Now as the incidents of terrorist attacks and natural calamities keep increasing, people are really heartfelt for those who have been a complete loss. Be it the hurricanes that have taken hundreds of lives in the Gulf Coast, or the series of bombing in Syria that has snatched children from their mothers, people have come up and raised voice against it or stood by those who have lost food, cloth, and shelter- the basic necessities of life.
However, there’s the American Anthropological Association which has devoted its time and topic for discussion on humanitarianism. This according to Sam Zherka is a strong point, but there are some serious issues of concern as well. It has often been rightly pointed out by the academicians that there is some serious shortage of vocabulary to correctly put humanitarianism in proper brackets.
While carrying out some research works, it has been seen that the discipline humanitarianism has found some rightful representation in political science, social structure and even the development of international relations. Even those who carry out some primary scanning of literary studies might find out what humanitarianism is in its raw sense. So what is humanitarianism?
However, while answering this question, Sam Zherka couldn’t track down any one single accepted definition. However, getting a biblical definition isn’t what the world looks forward to, especially to those who use it unproblematically. However, there are two different aspects that must be taken special care- one humanity, and second, a rational element in it. Look for some occidental connections, and you will find Christianity drawing strong bonds between humanitarianism and altruism or charitable donations. As anthropology has not defined the term under any circumstances, Christianity takes the liberty of using it in this sense.
It really gives a sense of immense joy when one realizes that the unchartered boundaries of humanitarianism have even been successful at finding some scholarly attention. There have been already multiple theories laid, and many more academic theories are already on the roll. But currently, those which are concerning power, authority, or even social relations are mostly drawn towards the subject. There’s no limitation to it, as the discipline finds a new shade to it at every attempt.
The world for long has been capitalistic which brings in stark contrast to all the theoretical constructs and practical implementation of humanitarianism. And this exactly where one needs to pour in and come up with an evolved society. Money can’t buy happiness, specifically the one which lies inherent in helping someone or standing side by side. There have been multiple hypothetical situations and also several living examples to mention what humanitarianism is. Standing by them, and carving out a complete constellation of activities to give a positive light to it is what the world expects.